Sample
#14
"Prevention is better than cure." Out of a country's
health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending
on health education and preventative measures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
model answer:
Of course it goes
without saying that prevention is better than cure.
That is why, in
recent years, there has been a growing body of opinion in favour of putting
more resources into health education and preventive measures.
The argument is
that ignorance of, for example, basic hygiene or the dangers of an unhealthy
diet or lifestyle needs to be combatted by special nationwide publicity
campaigns, as well as longer-term health education.
Obviously,there
is a strong human argument for catching any medical condition as early as
possible.
There is also an
economic argument for doing so.
Statistics
demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of treating a condition in the early stages,
rather than delaying until more expensive and prolonged treatment is necessary.
Then there are
social or economic costs, perhaps in terms of loss of earnings for the family
concerned or unemployed benefit paid by the state.
So far so good,
but the difficulties start when we try to define what the 'proportion' of the
budget should be, particularly if the funds will be 'diverted from treatment'.
Decisions on
exactly how much of the total health budget should be spent in this way are not
a matter for the non-specialist, but should be made on the basis of an accepted
health service model.
This is the point
at which real problems occur - the formulation of the model.
How do we accurately measure which health
education campaigns are effective in both medical and financial terms?
How do we agree
about the medical efficacy of various screening programmes, for example, when
the medical establishment itself does not agree?
A very rigorous
process of evaluation is called for, so that we can make informed decisions.
Sample
#15
The position of women in society
has changed markedly in the last twenty years.
Many of the problems young people
now experience, such as juvenile delinquency, arise from the fact that many
married women now work and are not at home to care for their children.
To what extent do you agree or
disagree with this opinion?
model answer:
It is certainly
true that the position of women in society has undergone a dramatic change in
the past twenty years but I do not feel that this is a direct cause of the
indisputable increase in juvenile-related problems during this period.
It is now
accepted that young women should find work on leaving school;
indeed to rely
totally on their parents' financial support is no longer an option in many
families.
Likewise, once
they get married, the majority of women continue working since the financial
pressures of setting up a house and establishing a reasonable standard of living
often require two incomes.
Twenty years ago
it was common for women to give up work once they had children and devote their
time to caring for their children.
This is no longer
the general rule and the provision of professionally-run child care facilities
and day nurseries have removed much of the responsibility for child rearing
that used to fall to mothers.
However, these
facilities come at a cost and often require two salaries coming into a family
to be afforded.
I do not believe
that the increase in the number of working mothers has resulted in children
being brought up less well than previously.
Indeed it could
be argued that by giving mothers the opportunity to work and earn extra money
children can be better provided for than previously.
There is more
money for luxuries and holidays and a more secure family life is possible.
Of course there
are limits as to the amount of time that ideally should be spent away from home
and the ideal scenario would be for one of the parents (often the wife) to have
a part-time job and thus be available for their children before and after
school.
It is important
to establish the correct balance between family life and working life.
0 Nhận xét